Voting 'yes' on personhood amendment may impact the use of birth control
By D. Beeksma
On November 4, 2011 At 3:12 pm
Category : News
Tags : amendment, birth, Birth Control Pills, colorado bar association, Control, diane rehm, Personhood, Scare Tactic
Responses : 5 Comments
Related Posts
- 19 House Republicans co-sponsor fetal personhood billJanuary 14, 2013
- Alabama Supreme Court says unborn are children, upholds convictions of women who used illegal drugs while pregnantJanuary 14, 2013
- Over the counter access to oral contraceptives proposed as a way to reduce unwanted pregnanciesNovember 21, 2012
- Lilly Ledbetter: Romney's position on women's rights 'scares me to death'October 19, 2012
- Former SNL comedian Victoria Jackson claims that a baby born of rape is 'God making a blessing out of something bad'October 16, 2012
Proponents of Mississippi's Initiative 26, the so-called personhood amendment which will amend the state constitution to declare that human life begins at the moment of fertilization and is thus protected as a living human being under the constitution, say that the amendment will not impact the use of birth control. Yes on 26 declares that this is nothing but a scare tactic, writing in a handout:
The Personhood Amendment will not ban the use of hormonal contraceptives, including most forms of the "Pill." However, drugs such as RU486 which allow a baby to be conceived and then expelled will be banned. [Note: The Yes on 26 Campaign does not advocate for the use of contraceptives but unequivocally states that Personhood will not outlaw the "Pill."]
But in an interview with NPR's Diane Rehm on October 31, Walter Hoye, a representative of Personhood USA, told a different story:
HOYE: Any birth control that ends the life of that human being will be impacted by this measure.
REHM: So that would then include the IUD. What about the birth control pill?
HOYE: It falls … It does fall into the same category. Yes.
The issue of birth control was raised in Colorado, where personhood amendments were soundly defeated in 2008 and 2010. The Colorado Bar Association opposed the measure due to its potential impact on birth control. Personhood proponents, who believe that fertilized eggs are human beings, do not support any type of birth control in which a fertilized egg cannot survive. As previously reported:
The argument centers around the implantation of the fertilized egg in the uterus. The fertilized egg cannot survive if it is not implanted. Because most birth-control pills and intrauterine devices work by preventing fertilized eggs from implanting, the use of these birth control methods deprives a fertilized egg, as a person, of its lawful and constitutionally guaranteed right to life. These forms of birth control would be classified as abortifacients, or agents that induce abortions, if personhood amendments were passed and became law.
Dan Grossman, an obstetrician/gynecologist at the University of California, San Francisco, told National Public Radio that, "The medical community has really been quite clear about when pregnancy begins, and that definition is that pregnancy begins once implantation occurs." He added that only about half of the fertilized eggs actually implant in the uterus, resulting in a pregnancy.
According to Keith Mason, co-founder of Personhood USA, "Birth control methods that do not kill an innocent human will not be affected." Personhood USA says that once a human egg is fertilized it is no longer an egg, but a new individual with his or her own DNA. It does not address the issue of implantation.
Mason told NPR, "Certainly women, my wife included, would want to know if the pills they're taking would kill a unique human individual, and I think there's a lot of misinformation about that, or lack of information. And I think this is another benefit of what we're doing: We're raising awareness about these issues."
Yesterday, Tim Wildom of the American Family Association, which has been pushing the personhood amendment in Mississippi swept the birth control issue and other concerns, such as entropic pregnancies and the health of the mother, under the table, telling his audience, "Don't be confused with all the legalese and the clutter and the noise out there, folks. Basically, that's fundamentally the question that they're asking, do you believe that the unborn baby, at the moment of fertilization or conception, is a person? Is a human being worthy of protection? If you believe that, you will vote yes."
D. Beeksma
One of the growing crowd of American "nones" herself, Deborah is a prolific writer who finds religion, spirituality and the impact of belief (and non-belief) on culture inspiring, fascinating and at times, disturbing. She hosts the God Discussion show and handles the site's technical work. Her education and background is in business, ecommerce and law.
More Posts - Website - Twitter
Seek and you shall find …
Notes and Announcements
GodDiscussion.com is a news and review service targeted for the growing number of people who are not associated with organized religion (we're a Google news site). Our mission is to inform and to get people having all points of view communicating. Our writers and contributors are theist, atheist and maybe somewhere in between. See our about page.
In our current poll, we ask, Do you need to believe in a god to find meaning and purpose for your life? It only takes a second to vote. Please weigh in!
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 28 -- The Christian segment of the God Discussion live talk show, hosted by Timothy Luke, explores the power of God and features guests and commentary on the faithful who have overcome obstacles.
View the calendar for upcoming shows and guests.
Get Our Daily Feed
Get our daily news and article headlines by email or RSS feed. Subscribe to God Discussion
Recently posted …
- Escapee from Westboro Baptist Church describes church's brainwashing and control tactics to CNN
- Pre-Passover swarms of locusts cloud Egypt, Israel
- Tea Party group wonders if CPAC has been compromised by the Muslim Brotherhood
- Personhood may be up for a vote in Georgia
- Sinead O'Connor Redux: Priest burns photo of ex-Pope Ratzinger because "a shepherd never leaves his flock"
- Newborn baby son dies after Orthodox Jewish parents killed in hit and run accident in New York
- Man's greatest cloning feat
- Miracle amidst tragedy: Expectant Orthodox Jewish couple die in car crash enroute to deliver baby at hospital; baby born at crash scene
- Christian Taliban-like pastor thinks women shouldn't leave the house, read books, or wear clothes of their own choosing









Pingback: Personhood amendments crop up in 13 U.S. states … and may be debated in Canada | God Discussion
Pingback: A Look at the State Republican Platforms: God bless the zygotes. | God Discussion
Pingback: Personhood may be up for a vote in Georgia | God Discussion