Because she is unable to have a child, Sarai tells her husband Abram to make her Egyptian slave his wife. The slave Hagar immediately becomes pregnant. Sarai treats the slave badly, so Hagar runs away and is "caught" by an angel of the LORD at a fountain on the way to Shur. With promises that her son Ishmael (named for her suffering) would be a wild man with lots of offspring, the angel tells Hagar to return to the abusive Sarai, which she does. She has a boy that Abram names Ishmael.
Quick Tips & Navigation.
About the Bible Slam – If you are new here, please read the "about" page to understand the choice of the word "slam" and to read the Important Disclaimer about swear words. We have provided a link to biblical reading without swear words or commentary on the about page, just in case swear words are offensive to you.
To fully comprehend the Bible philosophy, we suggest you start at the very beginning and work your way through, other than skipping around through it.
In Genesis 16:12, the angel describes what Ishmael will be like:
And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.
This apparently means that Ishmael will constantly be fighting everyone, including his relatives. What about free will? Was this predestined or was the angel merely prophetic?
Another Translation is:Gen.16:2 Hence Sar′ai said to A′bram: "Please, have relations with my maidservant. Perhaps I may get children from her." 3 Then Sar′ai, A′bram's wife, took Ha′gar, her Egyptian maidservant, and gave her to A′bram her husband as his wife." Still Agar was an Egyptian maidservant. (AS is wife)
The Bible is not approving slavery in what the modern understanding of the word slavery is, the Bible is making a story not giving a command to take many wives, because the idea was and is: Gen 2.24 \'That is why a man will leave his father and his mother and he must stick to his wife and they must become one flesh\' (his wife- one flesh).Besides concubinage was practiced under patriarchal law. A concubine had a legal status; her position was not a matter of fornication or adultery. Under the Law, if a man's firstborn son was the son of his concubine, this son would be the one to receive the firstborn's inheritance. — Deut. 21:15-17.
Concubinage and polygamy no doubt enabled the Israelites to increase at a much faster rate, and therefore, while God did not establish these arrangements but only allowed them, they served some purpose at the time. (Ex 1:7)
Sometime is useful to see this very old story with different eyes from the one used today. Things should be considered not from the point of view if they are good or bad but why they are that way, what are the reasons. It is too far easy to criticize than uderstand.
Among the Israelites the status of the Hebrew slave differed from that of a slave who was a foreigner, alien resident, or settler. Whereas the non-Hebrew remained the property of the owner and could be passed on from father to son (Le 25:44-46), the Hebrew slave was to be released in the seventh year of his servitude or in the Jubilee year, depending upon which came first. During the time of his servitude the Hebrew slave was to be treated as a hired laborer. (Ex 21:2; Le 25:10; De 15:12) A Hebrew who sold himself into slavery to an alien resident, to a member of an alien resident's family, or to a settler could be repurchased at any time, either by himself or by one having the right of repurchase. The redemption price was based on the number of years remaining until the Jubilee year or until the seventh year of servitude. (Le 25:47-52; De 15:12) When granting a Hebrew slave his freedom, the master was to give him a gift to assist him in getting a good start as a freedman. Much better than a odern employee.
about the site
Here in the States, a growing number of people are no longer affiliated with any religion. Yet, there are some Christian groups who continue to insist on blurring the lines of separation between church and state. For the non-churchgoers and freethinkers worldwide, this site features news, reviews and editorials on just about anything regarding religion. Your opinion is always welcome here, either as a columnist or commenter. Hey, this is not church -- you are allowed to speak your mind and think for yourself!
A NOTE ABOUT COMMENTS: While comments are welcomed and get the Do Follow option, they are strictly monitored. That means comments must be on topic and add to the discussion. Submissions from multiple names having the same IP, troll comments, keyphrase users and the like will be deleted. Please see our policies page for more information.
Another Translation is:Gen.16:2 Hence Sar′ai said to A′bram: "Please, have relations with my maidservant. Perhaps I may get children from her." 3 Then Sar′ai, A′bram's wife, took Ha′gar, her Egyptian maidservant, and gave her to A′bram her husband as his wife." Still Agar was an Egyptian maidservant. (AS is wife)
The Bible is not approving slavery in what the modern understanding of the word slavery is, the Bible is making a story not giving a command to take many wives, because the idea was and is: Gen 2.24 \'That is why a man will leave his father and his mother and he must stick to his wife and they must become one flesh\' (his wife- one flesh).Besides concubinage was practiced under patriarchal law. A concubine had a legal status; her position was not a matter of fornication or adultery. Under the Law, if a man's firstborn son was the son of his concubine, this son would be the one to receive the firstborn's inheritance. — Deut. 21:15-17.
Concubinage and polygamy no doubt enabled the Israelites to increase at a much faster rate, and therefore, while God did not establish these arrangements but only allowed them, they served some purpose at the time. (Ex 1:7)
Sometime is useful to see this very old story with different eyes from the one used today. Things should be considered not from the point of view if they are good or bad but why they are that way, what are the reasons. It is too far easy to criticize than uderstand.
Among the Israelites the status of the Hebrew slave differed from that of a slave who was a foreigner, alien resident, or settler. Whereas the non-Hebrew remained the property of the owner and could be passed on from father to son (Le 25:44-46), the Hebrew slave was to be released in the seventh year of his servitude or in the Jubilee year, depending upon which came first. During the time of his servitude the Hebrew slave was to be treated as a hired laborer. (Ex 21:2; Le 25:10; De 15:12) A Hebrew who sold himself into slavery to an alien resident, to a member of an alien resident's family, or to a settler could be repurchased at any time, either by himself or by one having the right of repurchase. The redemption price was based on the number of years remaining until the Jubilee year or until the seventh year of servitude. (Le 25:47-52; De 15:12) When granting a Hebrew slave his freedom, the master was to give him a gift to assist him in getting a good start as a freedman. Much better than a odern employee.