Various Groups Defend Westboro Baptist Church's Rights
By D. Beeksma
On July 19, 2010 At 7:12 am
Category : News
Tags : Law, message, Press, speech
Responses : No Comments
Related Posts
- Creationist Indiana GOP Senator demands teachers prove evolutionDecember 5, 2012
- Blasphemy laws to be revoked in the NetherlandsDecember 5, 2012
- Republican Senate votes against UN disabilities rights treatyDecember 5, 2012
- Louisiana court strikes down private school voucher planDecember 4, 2012
- Child marriages challenged in Malaysia after wedding of twelve year oldDecember 3, 2012
Last week, a number of groups filed briefs with the Supreme Court, defending the Westboro Baptist Church's freedom of speech. While none of them condoned the Phelps' message or method, they all agreed on one thing: The Westboro Baptist Church's propaganda is free speech protected by the First Amendment.
The Associated Baptist Press notes that those filing briefs supporting the church included,
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 21 news-media organizations;
- Rutherford Institute, a conservative Christian organization;
- Liberty Counsel, a conservative Christian law group; and
- A group of professors of constitutional law.
According to the article,
A group of professors of constitutional law said the Supreme Court has protected "offensive speech" in the past, "because it contributes to discourse on issues of public interest and because efforts to censor it often result from antipathy towards the speaker's message."
"Unpopular speech is more likely to offend people than conventional wisdom," the professors said. For that reason, they argued, allowing "indiscriminate punishment" of offensive speech would, in the words of a previous court opinion, "effectively empower a majority to silence dissidents simply as a matter of personal predilections."
Earlier, 48 states and veterans groups filed briefs with the Supreme Court, asking that damages that had been awarded to Albert Snyder but overturned on appeal be reinstated. These groups claim an interest in preserving the dignity of military funerals.
D. Beeksma
One of the growing crowd of American "nones" herself, Deborah is a prolific writer who finds religion, spirituality and the impact of belief (and non-belief) on culture inspiring, fascinating and at times, disturbing. She hosts the God Discussion show and handles the site's technical work. Her education and background is in business, ecommerce and law.
More Posts - Website - Twitter
Seek and you shall find …
Notes and Announcements
GodDiscussion.com is a news and review service targeted for the growing number of people who are not associated with organized religion (we're a Google news site). Our mission is to inform and to get people having all points of view communicating. Our writers and contributors are theist, atheist and maybe somewhere in between. See our about page.
Current poll: What do you think about religious displays on government property during the holiday season? During Christmas, should government be endorsing the Christian religion or do you care? Take a second to vote in our current poll.
Best-selling author and psychologist Dr. Darrel Ray is our special guest on the December 7 GodDiscussion show -- plus we'll be taking a look at the 2012 Hours Against Hate campaign sponsored by the U.S. State Department.
View the calendar for upcoming shows and guests.
Get Our Daily Feed
Get our daily news and article headlines by email or RSS feed. Subscribe to God Discussion
Recently posted …
- Poll: What do you think about Christmas displays in the public square?
- This Week on the God Discussion Show – Dr. Darrel Ray, The Therapy Project
- Parents who killed their child for not reading the bible have been arrested
- Firearms classes offered by Texas church to fend off imaginary Mexican enemies
- Republican Congressman refuses service to Muslim couple in his restaurant
- Creationist Indiana GOP Senator demands teachers prove evolution
- Blasphemy laws to be revoked in the Netherlands
- Atheist oaths proposed for UK Boy Scouts
- Republican Senate votes against UN disabilities rights treaty








