C S Lewiss Mere Christianity – Shepherds Notes
C S Lewiss Mere Christianity Shepherds Notes
User Ratings and Reviews
5 Stars Shepherd's Notes is not the whole book
If you are viewing the page for Mere Christianity (Shepherd's Notes), you are looking at a sort of Cliff Notes book. I'm glad I ordered it by mistake (I just put in my order for the actual book) because it looks like an extremely useful tool for understanding the context of Mere Christianity. Before you click Add to Cart, make sure you are buying the book you actually want.
5 Stars Detailed Devotion
I am really enjoying the detail that Mere Christianity Shepherd's Notes has for group devotionals, and individual study. This is a great companion to the complete book.
3 Stars I Like It
Lewis wants to be a Christian but his intellect got in the way. So he worshiped a differant God.
1 Star Deceptive description
This book is not "Mere Christianity", it is a guide to go along with it. Do not Purchase it thinking that you will get the text of the book "Mere Christianity".
5 Stars Diamonds or coal, take your pick.
As a young man trying to decide whether or not to believe the things I grew up in, this book was very helpful to me. I remember reading the chapter on pride, "The Great Sin," one night at a camp in Alaska where I was counseling. The Holy Spirit showed me myself in that chapter. I poured over this book in those days, internalized it, even learned Chinese hoping to translate it.
I have since "moved on" to more detailed and empirically-oriented books by Christians, skeptics, and followers of other religions. Many of these offer interesting facts and insights. But the only place I have found as much wisdom as here (outside the Bible) was G. K. Chestertons's Everlasting Man, which influenced Lewis to faith. (As for Conversations With God, the innane "revelation" one reader recommends instead, a single paragraph of Lewis or Chesterton contains more wisdom than the whole first volume.)
Lewis has a marvelous gift for explaining things in simple terms without patronizing or talking down. Some may find his argument difficult, and others, too simple. In that case I recommend further reading; Lewis is not trying to be thorough.
I agree with the skeptic below that Lewis does not offer "proof" of God, or even logically-compelling evidence. He dismisses atheism with amazing abruptness. "Atheism is too simple. . . If the universe has no meaning, we would never have found out." (How does he know that? Does he have a control universe in his pocket?) But don't misunderstand. Lewis does not really offer "proof" of God. Notice he calls section one, "Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe." Lewis views our relationship with God not in scientific but in personal terms. God does not force faith on His wayward children, but drops hints for those who are seeking, is his assumption. Life is not an equation, but an adventure, even a romance with truth.
Some also suggest a loophole in Lewis' famous "Liar, Lunatic, or Lord" argument for the deity of Christ. Jesus' words were misrepresented by his followers, they say: he didn't really make the claims the Gospels say he did. Here again, remember that Lewis is trying to be concise. If you want his answer to that objection (still a very devastating answer, if you are familiar with Jesus Seminar material), you'll find it in his essay, Fernseed and Elephants. The argument is also more fully developed in the first chapters of "On the Man Called Christ," in part two of Everlasting Man, where I guess Lewis found it in the first place.
There are books with a more empirical approach to the existence of God; Hugh Ross' book on the Anthropic Principle, Creator and the Cosmos, for example, or Don Richardson's Eternity in Their Hearts, that shows how God has worked in cultures around the world. My new book, Jesus and the Religions of Man, argues for the existence of God from comparative religion and miracles. It also discusses the divinity of Jesus in relation to other religions. But I don't know any modern popular author of any viewpoint who can hold a candle to Lewis or Chesterton in terms of expressing deep truths in simple words. Reading Mere Christianity and finding only "a mess of holes," would be like going into a mine full of precious jewels and coming out with bucket of coal. There are truths here that will enrich you the rest of your life, if you lay hold of them.
d.marshall@sun.ac.jp
Related posts:
- Mere Christianity
- Mere Catholicism
- Preparation for Passover – Rabbi Removes Notes to God from the Western Wall
- Counterfeit Christianity – How Ancient Paganism Mixed with Christianity
- American Babylon – Notes of a Christian Exile
- The Complete C S Lewis Signature Classics
- Christian No More | On Leaving Christianity – Debunking Christianity and Embracing Atheism and Freethinking
- The Seduction of Christianity – Spiritual Discernment in the Last Days
- What Did Jesus Really Say – How Christianity Went Astray What To Say To A Born Again Christian Fundamentalist But Never Had The Information
- Great Emergence – The How Christianity Is Changing and Why
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Leave a Reply
Here in the States, a growing number of people are no longer affiliated with any religion. Yet, there are some Christian groups who continue to insist on blurring the lines of separation between church and state. For the non-churchgoers and freethinkers worldwide, this site features news, reviews and editorials on just about anything regarding religion. Your opinion is always welcome here, either as a columnist or commenter. Hey, this is not church -- you are allowed to speak your mind and think for yourself!
A NOTE ABOUT COMMENTS: While comments are welcomed and get the Do Follow option, they are strictly monitored. That means comments must be on topic and add to the discussion. Submissions from multiple names having the same IP, troll comments, keyphrase users and the like will be deleted. Please see our policies page for more information.
 |
 |
Main Feed | Comments Feed |
|
 |
 |