Home / News / Coalition fights Florida prosecuting attorney's 'biblical strategy' for death penalty sentencing
Coalition fights Florida prosecuting attorney's 'biblical strategy' for death penalty sentencing

Coalition fights Florida prosecuting attorney's 'biblical strategy' for death penalty sentencing

Americans United for Separation of Church and State (Americans United) has joined a coalition of faith and civil liberties groups in fighting a "biblical strategy" used by a Florida prosecuting attorney who convinced a jury to vote for the death penalty by presenting explicitly religious evidence to the jurors and repeatedly citing the Book of Romans.

In an amicus brief filed yesterday with the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Americans United and other groups asserted that Anthony J. Farina’s sentencing was prejudiced because prosecutor John Tanner argued that the Bible – specifically the Book of Romans – called for the death penalty.  Tanner cross-examined a minister who had counseled Farina in prison, arguing with him over questions about the nature of the Bible, the crucifixion of Jesus and the Christian concept of forgiveness. Tanner asserted that the “infallible word of God” mandates capital punishment.

“Portions of this trial read like a medieval debate on the nature of God, not a proceeding in a secular American court,” said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United. “Punishment for crimes should be based on what the law allows, not what someone believes the Bible mandates.”

Americans United reports that during the sentencing phase of the trial, Tanner grilled Farina’s pastor, the Rev. James Davis, demanding to know his interpretation of passages in the Book of Romans.

In his summation, Tanner again alluded to the portion of Romans that provides that those who “rebel against the authority … will bring judgment on themselves,” by arguing to the jury that Farina and a co-defendant “brought this judgment upon themselves.”

The jury subsequently voted 12-0 in favor of the death penalty.

In the brief, AU and the other groups assert that this injection of religion into secular court proceedings was highly irregular and improper.

“There is no constitutionally legitimate basis for a prosecutor to inject religious teachings into the jury’s choice of life or death in a capital case,” reads the brief. The brief continues:

"The state courts of Florida are not ecclesiastical courts, and the entanglement of religious doctrine in a criminal trial is the kind of breach of church-state separation that not only prejudices the defendant but also injures the interests of the diverse religious communities that thrive in our society in part by virtue of their independence from the operations of the state.

"The Constitution prohibits the application of religious law to criminal defendants precisely because different religious groups (including different Christian denominations) have differing views about theological rules and the interpretations of biblical texts – such as the teachings of religion regarding the morality of capital punishment. Prosecutor Tanner’s use of Pastor Davis to instruct the jury that religious law called for a sentence of death was grossly improper."

The brief asserts that Tanner “invited the jurors to deliver justice in accordance with religious, rather than secular, law” and that he “grossly prejudiced Farina’s right to a fair trial.”

In addition to Americans United, groups signing the brief include the Union for Reform Judaism, the Central Conference of American Rabbis, Women of Reform Judaism, Interfaith Alliance Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Council of Jewish Women, the General Synod of the United Church of Christ and the Unitarian Universalist Association.

The brief in the Farina v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections case was drafted for the groups by Andrew L. Frey, Evan M. Tager, Brian D. Netter and E. Brantley Webb of Mayer Brown LLP in Washington, D.C., with assistance from Ayesha N. Khan, legal director of Americans United, and Arielle Gingold of the Interfaith Alliance Foundation.

Americans United is a religious liberty watchdog group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1947, the organization educates Americans about the importance of church-state separation in safeguarding religious freedom.

About D. Beeksma

One of the growing crowd of American "nones" herself, Deborah is a prolific writer who finds religion, spirituality and the impact of belief (and non-belief) on culture inspiring, fascinating and at times, disturbing. She hosts the God Discussion show and handles the site's technical work. Her education and background is in business, ecommerce and law.
  • Spuddie

    The upside to this is we are talking about a prosecutor here. Not a judge. The actual harm done here is to the budget of the court district for inviting lawsuits which would not be necessary otherwise.

    A prosecutor can't demand capital punishment unless the crime meets the standard of the criminal statutes for doing so. One expects a prosecutor to act badly when it comes to interpreting the law against a defendant. More people are acquitted due to prosecutorial idiocy than actual innocence.

    In the end, its the judge who reads the instructions to the jury concerning the standards necessary for voting for the death penalty. Although Tanner, "invited the jury" to apply religious standards here, his positions carries no weight to do very much here. Its theatrics for its own sake.

    My question is, what kind of idiot judge and defense attorney even let Pastor Davis in the courtroom? There is no way his testimony was going to be probative (factually relevant) nor anything other than prejudicial for either party.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jeff.see.7 Jeff See

    I've said it before, and I'll say it again: you can keep Florida. I've left nothing behind there, and if I did, you can have it. I realize this adds nothing to the discussion. I just honestly think that the Union would be better off if the Atlantic reclaimed Florida. No offense meant to the four or five people there who might actually have some sense.

  • sam

    Hi there! Civil law is rather complicated in the US, that is why I appreciate authors like you, who can make these issuer clear for readers. I bet you know lots of good lawyers and I want to invite them to submit their contacts to Attorney Directory on Attorney Online. This directory is structured by practice areas and states and gives visitors pries information about lawyers’ experience. For example, look at the category of Florida civil attorneys  Visitor can see faces of lawyers, evaluate their practice areas and choose one to call. I hope to gather there all best US lawyers.

Scroll To Top